Kansas Drug Abuse: A Different Kind of School Test

Drug testing and screening are routine for many people: athletes, job applicants, employees, and students. Despite this, there are still others who feel that their privacies are violated when institutions require them to undergo drug testing. But it is imperative since the law condemns anyone who engages in activities involving drugs — it does not recognize differences between a private user, a party user, or a drug pusher.

Drug testing also offers many advantages for the individuals who require it and for those who submit to it. For employers who advocate drug testing, it is a way to minimize costs and secure gains. The initial investment in having all their employees tested ensures continuous productivity and less workplace tension and problems among employees. They are able to weed out and reject employees and applicants alike who are drug dependents. The employers save by doing away with non-performing employees and by reducing production costs such as salaries and benefits. Professional athletes also undergo drug testing and screening regularly to monitor use of performance drugs in order to maintain fair play and healthy competition.

Aside from the major institutions requiring drug testing, schools, especially colleges, high schools, and middle schools are also subject to it. The drug testing process includes mandatory and random drug tests among the students and school personnel (i.e. teachers, maintenance, etc.). Though there are some — like Kansas State professor Bob Shoop — who feel that drug testing and screening are invasive actions against a person’s privacy and violations of democratic rights, most think otherwise. Most school officials feel that these are necessary efforts to maintain an atmosphere conducive to learning and student safety. Benefits that schools reap as a result of drug screening are obvious. Primarily, drug testing reduces the use and market of drugs within the school, thus, discouraging drug pushers to sell on campus. There are also lower incidents of school violence as most of the kids’ violent behaviors are due to substance abuse. As a result, schools become safer and peaceful, thereby maintaining a positive learning environment.

The effects and help of drug screening to students are more personal and less noticeable. First, the substance and drug use problems of kids surface making them open to receive help and substance counseling. Counselors agree that the earlier drug and substance abuse are detected, the easier it is for kids to kick the habit off. Second, mandatory routine drug testing and screening discourage students from taking drugs and give them a valid, indisputable reason to refuse offers to use drugs. Surveys reveal that kids are more prone to take drugs if their reasons for refusing are easily dispelled by pushers. Third, and probably the most crucial, drug testing helps develop the kids’ full potential even indirectly. If their environment is drug-free, students are keener to explore positive activities like art, sports, or writing and give better academic performance.

There are debates about drug testing and screening, especially in schools. But in situations as delicate as students’ safety and drug use, perhaps it is better to tip the balance in favor of the pros. Surely, bright, healthy, and drug tested individuals are preferable than free, drug-dependent people with broken futures.

Dangers of Teenage Drinking and Driving – Educational Video – Discussion of the problem of teenage drinking and driving, made in cooperation with the Yale Center of Alcohol Studies. 3 college men, one doing no drinking, one drinking beer and one drinking heavily are studied. Results are compared to effects of equivalent amounts in rats. Depicts an accidents resulting from only casual drinking before driving. Shows rat experiments, teenagers drinking in bar and dancing, and alludes to death of one couple because of driving while intoxicated. Producer: Centron Corporation. Young drivers are a high-risk group, partially because they are young and just learning the rules, but that is not the only reason. Young drivers often think they are invincible; that the crashes caused by teenage drinking and driving reported on the news will never happen to them. According to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, the youngest drivers are less likely to drive after drinking, but are more likely to crash when they do, because of inexperience with both alcohol and driving and the combination of the two. In 2003, 27 percent of 16-20-year-old passenger vehicle drivers fatally injured in crashes had high BACs (0.08 percent or more). The percentage of high BACs was much lower among females (13 percent) than among males (33 percent), and also was lower among 16-17-year-old drivers (16 percent) than among 18-19-year-old (30 percent) or 20-year-old (35 percent) drivers. In many high schools, students come face to face with the effects of teenage …

Walker to mend political divide with brats, beer

Filed under: Kansas Drug Abuse

Most of the jurors in Jerry Sandusky's child sexual abuse trial have been chosen, and their ranks reflect the strong role Penn State plays in its community. A jury was selected Wednesday in the child molestation scandal that brought down Joe Paterno, …
Read more on KGWN

Narconon Spokesperson Reports: Arrests Alone Won't Curtail Addiction Issues

Filed under: Kansas Drug Abuse

While this provides a certain degree of justice for the family of the deceased person, it is unlikely to have much of an effect on the substance abuse and addiction problems themselves. In St. Louis in the fall of 2011, dozens of people were arrested …
Read more on DigitalJournal.com (press release)

Friday's Sports Transactions

Filed under: Kansas Drug Abuse

AP, MLB_Suspended retired RHP James Ehlert 50 games after a second violation of drug abuse under the minor league drug prevention and treatment program. BALTIMORE ORIOLES_Placed OF Nick Markakis on the 15-day DL, retroactive to May 30.
Read more on San Antonio Express